检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:方丕华[1] 王方正[1] 张奎俊[1] 陈新[1] 孙瑞龙[1] 唐承君[1] 李永利[1]
机构地区:[1]中国医学科学院,阜外医院
出 处:《心脏起搏与心电生理杂志》1994年第3期131-132,共2页
摘 要:本研究比较了冷凝消融实验性室性心动过速(VT)中两种动物模型的特点及各自的局限性。结果表明:用心肌梗塞模型诱发VT适用于研究心肌梗塞后VT的产生机理、病理生理、血液动力学变化,评价药物疗效及观察预后等。而乌头碱局部心肌注射所用剂量小,诱发VT的时间短、诱发率高、持续时间长,是研究非药物治疗心律失常如电灼、冷凝、激光和化学消融等理想的VT模型。The model of ventricular tachycardia(VT)induced by electric stimulation on myocardial infarction(MI)model was compared with the model of VT by aconitine. The results suggested that the former was suitable for studies of productive mechanism,pathopysiology.hemodynamics on VT after acute MI.evaluation of therapeutic effect of drug on VT as well as investigation of prognosis of VT.The latter was an ideal model for studies of nonpharmacotherapy of arrhythmias such as fulguration,cryoablation,laser ablation and chemical ablation for the amount of caonitine used in inducing VT each time was smaller,the successful rate of inducing VT was higher,the time spent in inducing VT was shorter and the duration of sustained VT was longer.
分 类 号:R541.710.2[医药卫生—心血管疾病] R542.220.2[医药卫生—内科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.209