腹腔镜下4种子宫切除术的比较  被引量:8

A comparison of four methods for laparoscopic hysterectomy

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:肖红新[1] 汪洁萍[1] 任冉[1] 

机构地区:[1]辽宁省大连市妇产医院妇科,大连116033

出  处:《中国微创外科杂志》2005年第3期184-186,共3页Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery

摘  要:目的 探讨腹腔镜子宫切除术 4种术式的临床价值。 方法 对腹腔镜筋膜内子宫切除术(classicalintrafascialsupracervicalhysterectomy, CISH) 11例,腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术(laparoscopicassistedvaginalhysterectomy, LAVH)9例,腹腔镜下次全子宫切除术 (subtotallaparoscopichysterectomy, SLH) 10例及腹腔镜下全子宫切除术 (totallaparoscopichysterectomy,TLH)11例进行回顾性分析。 结果 CISH、LAVH、SLH及TLH4组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后排气时间及术后住院时间均无统计学差异(P>0. 05)。4组术后病率均为 0,均无严重并发症。 结论 4种术式安全可行,但应根据病人的具体情况选择。Objective To investigate the clinical value of four kinds of laparoscopic hysterectomy. Methods A retrospective analysis was made on 11 cases of classical intrafascial supracervical hysterectomy (CISH), 9 cases of laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH), 10 cases of subtotal laparoscopic hysterectomy (SLH) and 11 cases of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). Results There was no statistical significance in operating time, intraoperative blood loss, time to first flatus and postoperative hospital stay among the four groups ( P >0 05). No postoperative pyrexia and severe complications occurred in all the four groups. Conclusions The four procedures are all safe and feasible. The selection of these procedures is based on the patient’s individual conditions.

关 键 词:腹腔镜 子宫切除术 阴式子宫切除术 

分 类 号:R713.42[医药卫生—妇产科学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象