我国民法是否应采纳物权行为  

Shall Civil Law of Our Country Adopt Juristic Acts of Real Rights or not?

作　　者：张小玲[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉警官职业学院,湖北武汉430079

出　　处：《湖北广播电视大学学报》2005年第2期106-108,共3页Journal of Hubei Radio & Television University

摘　　要：本文通过对德国、法国、台湾等国家和地区在此问题上的民事立法及学者学说的考察与借鉴,通过 对我国《民法通则》有关所有权转移的规定的分析,在对物权行为的独立性、无因性理论进行评述之后,主张对物权 行为理论采取否定的态度。As an important concept in real laws of German Civil Law and some country's real laws in-flucnced by it, juristic acts of real rights means legal acts in the purpose of real rights change.It is com-bined by expression of real rights change and its characteristics-register and tradition. Real legislation in our country is still blank today. Through the analyzing on regulation about passing of title in 'general principles of civil law', after the commenting on the independence and no-reason theory, the author claimed negative attitude on juristic acts of real rights theory.

关 键 词：物权行为 独立性 无因性 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]