司法权对行政权监督的多重视界  

A MULTITIERED PERSPECTIVE OF SUPERVISION OF JUDICIAL RIGHT OVER ADMINISTRATIVE RIGHT

作　　者：马晓娜[1] 彭泉[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南农业大学人文学院,重庆北碚400716

出　　处：《西南农业大学学报（社会科学版）》2005年第1期50-52,共3页Journal of Southwest Agricultural University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：西南农业大学专项基金项目资助。

摘　　要：用司法权来监督行政权是现代各国建设法治国家的成功经验。司法权对行政权监督的能力取决于行政诉讼法律制度的建构,在一般性的理解中容易把法院受案范围的大小作为衡量司法权对行政权监督能力的唯一标准。而事实上,行政诉讼中对原告资格的确定,司法审查的强度和标准以及诉的形式和种类等也是考查司法权对行政权监督能力所不能忽视和缺少的视界。The supervision of judicial right over administrative right is successful in modern countries under the rule of law. The realization of supervision of judicial right over administrative right relies on the establishment of a law system of administrative persecution. A misunderstanding exists widely that “judicial accepted range” is taken as the sole criterion in evaluating the ability of judicial right to supervise administrative right. In fact, the establishment of plaintiff qualification, the intensity and standard of judicial review and the form of judicial adjudge are also essential and innegligible for evaluating the ability of judicial right to supervise administrative right.

关 键 词：受案范围 原告资格 司法审查 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]