检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京农业大学,北京华牧农科院畜牧所,天津华牧家禽育种中心,华牧家禽育种中心
出 处:《Acta Genetica Sinica》1994年第6期441-446,共6页
基 金:国家自然科学基金
摘 要:本实验用实验昆虫赤拟谷盗两个世代各30个家系的859和726只蛹的23日龄蛹长和蛹宽作为选择性状模拟种公畜选择,对常规方法和改进方法进行比较。以Henderson方法Ⅲ和综合指数作为常规方法,用约束最大似然法(REML)和BLUP估计方差组分和育种值为改进方法。结果表明,常规法估计遗传参数在两世代中不稳定,而改进方法弥补此缺点。对两世代个体和家系育种值排队,结果表明两种方法在前几名无差别,说明在选择强度大(留种率低)时,两种方法效果基本一致。The simulation of sire genetic evaluation using Tribolium castaneum for the comparison of two statistical methodes: Handerson'S method 3 and REML for the variance components, and the comparison of two methods:selection index and BLUP.The same data set of pupal length and pupal width in two generations for heritabilities and breeding values was analysed by the different methods. Results showed that heritabilities of two traits estimated by Handerson's methods 3 were lower than that estimated by REML and did not remain stable in two generations. The rankinq of each family average breeding value showed that there was no differece among the first five selected families by the two methods. It suggested that the usual meshod may be used for sire evaluation when selection intensities of traits are high.This project supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China ②Present adress: Huamn Toultry Dreeding Center,Tianjin 301700.③Present adress:Institute of Amimal Sciences, CAAS. Beijing 100094
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170