德国文学浪漫派的哲学旨趣——以诺瓦利斯、荷尔德林的作品为例  

The Analysis of Philosophy by German Romanticists in Literature A preliminary analysis of the philosophical interest of Novalis' and Holderlin's Work

作　　者：季雨[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学哲学与社会学学院,北京100875

出　　处：《学术交流》2005年第4期173-177,共5页Academic Exchange

摘　　要：康德所言的抽象的纯粹道德意义上的“自我”,经费希特理性与思辨的加工后,上升为本体论意义的意志。这种将自我、宗教信仰、一种绝对化的精神存在状态作为哲学旨趣的倾向,很快就影响了文学浪漫派的主要旗手。诺瓦利斯对于黑夜和死亡的关注,对于信仰和无限的执著,对于意象“蓝花”的阐释,荷尔德林冷静激情中沉淀的忧郁的“还乡情结”和其对神性的敬畏与渴求,在其思维的逻辑线条背后都有费希特等哲学家对于生、自我、信仰等核心范畴的基本思路。Using the method of logic, Kant criticized broadly the spiritual activity of man, delimiting the sphere of reason. Based on this, Fichte derived the thesis that “self and non-self are posited by the self”. Modified by Fichte with reason and speculation, the abstract and purely moral “self” posited by Kant was elevated to the level of will with ontological significance. This effort to treat self, religious faith, and an absolute state of spiritual existence as being of philosophical interest quickly exerted its influence on the major standard-bearers of literary Romanticism. Behind the lines of logical thinking of Novalis concern with night and death, his persistence in the quest for faith and the limitless, and his explication of the image of “blue flower”, as well as Holderlin's melancholy “return home” complex born of a calm passion and his reverence and quest for the divine is the basic approach to the core concepts of life, self, and faith by Fichte and other philosophers. This paper aims to interpret the philosophical interest of German Romanticists in this context.

关 键 词：浪漫派 哲学 诺瓦利斯 荷尔德林 

分 类 号：I516.064[文学—其他各国文学]