检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河北省邯郸市中国人民解放军第二八五医院疼痛门诊,056001
出 处:《实用疼痛学杂志》2005年第2期90-92,共3页Pain Clinic Journal
摘 要:目的比较星状神经节加椎间孔阻滞与颈部硬膜外阻滞治疗颈椎病的疗效。方法232例颈椎病的患者,年龄30-68岁,分为两组:Ⅰ组(星状神经节加椎间孔阻滞)135例;Ⅱ组(颈部硬膜外阻滞组)97例。治疗效果分为3级:痊愈、显效、无效。结果Ⅰ组治疗后,痊愈率为54.1%,显效率为42.2%,Ⅱ组治疗后痊愈率为39.2%,显效率为52.6%,Ⅰ组痊愈率明显高于Ⅱ组(P<0.01)。1年后随访,Ⅰ组痊愈率为50.4%,显效率为42.2%;Ⅱ组痊愈率为34.0%,显效率为51.5%,两组间痊愈率的差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论星状神经节加椎间孔阻滞治疗颈椎病的近、远期疗效明显优于颈部硬膜外阻滞。Objective To compare the effect between combination of stellate ganglion with foramen intervertebral block and cervical epidural block for the treatment of cervical spondylopathy. Methods 232 patients with cervical spondylopathy were divided randomly into two groups, in group I,135 patients were treated by cervical ganglion block combined with intervertebral foramen block and in group Ⅱ, 97 patients were treated by cervical epidural block. The effective rates marked excellent, good and inefficacy. Results In group Ⅰ, the excellent and good rates were 54.1% and 42.2% respectively; in group Ⅱ, those rates were 39.2% and 52.6% respectively. The excellent rates was higher in group I than in groupⅡ (P><0.01). After one year follow-up, the excellent rates were 50.4% and 42.2% respectively in group Ⅰ; 34.0% and 51.5% respectively in group Ⅱ(P<0.01). Conclusion Treatment with stellate ganglion block combined by intervertebral foramen block for cervical spondylopathy was superior than by cervical epidural block in short-term and long-term curative effect.
关 键 词:椎间孔阻滞治疗 星状神经节 颈椎病 颈部硬膜外阻滞 硬膜外阻滞治疗 痊愈率 显效率 治疗效果 远期疗效 治疗后 1年后 统计学
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7