论沉默权对中国公安体制的冲击与挑战  

On Reticence's Pounding and Challange to China Public Security System

作　　者：李海霞[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民公安大学研究生部,北京100038

出　　处：《江西公安专科学校学报》2001年第4期50-53,共4页Journal of Jiangxi Public Security College

摘　　要：如果引入沉默权,必然会对公安机关产生重大影响。从消极的方面来说,它将对以口供为中心的侦查模式、“坦白从宽,抗拒从严”的刑事政策产生挑战,从而使犯罪嫌疑人有了一个理直气壮的反侦查机会。从积极的方面来说,它使得我们的诉讼模式跟刑事诉讼的精神相一致,而且可以逐步改变侦查人员依赖口供的心理。对此,侦查机关应该重新构筑侦查讯问模式、注意讯问方式的转换和对讯问功能弱化的补救。China public security organs would be greatly influenced if reticence were introduced. From the negative aspect, it challenges the testimony-centered investigation pattern and criminal policy which emphasizes 'confess, lenient in treatment; defy, severe in treatment'. So suspects have the oppotunity of anti-investigation with perfect assurance. From the positive aspect, with the introduction of reticence, not only is the lawsuit pattern in harmony with criminal suit, but also investigators' depending on testi-mony can be changed step by step. Therefore,investigation organs should re-construct terrogation pattern and pay attention to transformation of terrogation way.

关 键 词：沉默权 公安体制 挑战 

分 类 号：D631[政治法律—政治学]