宪法司法化的理论困境和现实出路  

THEORETICAL EMBARRASSMENT OF THE JUDICIALIZATION OF THE CONSTITUTION AND ITS PRACTICAL OUTLET

作　　者：彭美[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南师范大学政法学院,重庆400715

出　　处：《西华师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2005年第2期32-33,共2页Journal of China West Normal University:Philosophy & Social Sciences

摘　　要：由齐玉苓诉陈晓琪案引发了宪法司法化的大讨论,对于宪法司法化的理解有两种立场:法律解释学立场和法律政策学立场。笔者认为,基于宪法的二重性和中国大陆法系的传统和具体实际,建构中国的宪法司法化制度只能采取法律政策学的立场。Chen Xiaoqi's case accused by Qi Yuling has caused a heated discussion on the judicialization of the constitution in which there are two stands about its understanding,ie.Legal Explanation and Legal Politics.The author holds that,thanks ot the dual character of the constitiction,the tradition of legal system in China and the concrete practice,we can only take up the stand of Legal Politics in the construction of the system of judicialization of the constitution in our country.

关 键 词：宪法司法化 理论困境 法律政策学 法律解释学 大陆法系 立场 齐玉苓 二重性 中国 

分 类 号：D921[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] B82.052[政治法律—法学]