检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘瑛[1]
机构地区:[1]河南公安高等专科学校刑事技术系,河南郑州450002
出 处:《河南社会科学》2005年第2期64-66,共3页Henan Social Sciences
摘 要:鉴定结论作为法定证据之一,与其他证据相比有其自己独特之处。在诉讼中,各国对鉴定结论之审查判断有一定的差异。我国应关注两大法系的发展趋势,构建和完善符合中国国情的鉴定结论之审查判断制度。The conclusion of appraisal, acting as one of legal testimony has its own distinctive qualities compared with other testimonies. In litigation there are some differences in the examination and decision on the conclusion of appraisal in different countries. In China the two legal systems should be noticed and the system of the examination and decision of the conclusion of appraisal in accordance with the condition of China should be formed and improved.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3