检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国农业科学》2005年第4期709-713,共5页Scientia Agricultura Sinica
基 金:国家重点基础研究发展规划项目(G2000018606);国家应急计划项目(FS2000-003)
摘 要:应用土地当量比、产量当量、产值当量等不同量化指标,对复种、间作、轮作等不同种植方式的产出效果进行了比较研究。结果表明,与单作一熟农田相比,复种、间作及轮作农田土地利用效率分别提高62%、38%和21%;单位面积产量分别为单作一熟农田的1.63、1.29 和1.16 倍;复种、间作农田单位面积产值分别为单作一熟农田的1.76 和1.35 倍。通过综合分析,进一步明确了评价不同种植方式产出效果的客观方法,为今后农作制度中不同种植方式农田产出效果的比较研究提供理论依据。The concept related to yield equivalent and value of output equivalent is proposed. Using various quantitative standards such as land equivalent ratio, yield equivalent, and value of output equivalent, the efficiency of various cropping patterns such as sequential cropping, row cropping, crop rotation was studied. The result showed, comparing with sole cropping, the land use efficiency of sequential cropping, row cropping, crop rotation raised by 62%, 38% and 21%. The unit area yield of sequential cropping, row cropping, crop rotation was 1.63, 1.29 and 1.16 times of sole cropping. The unit area value of double cropping, row cropping was 1.76 and 1.35 times of sole cropping. Through comprehensive analysis, the objective methods for comparison of farm output efficiency are cleared. The paper has provided a theoretical basis for comparison study output efficiency of various cropping patterns in future.
关 键 词:作物 种植方式 土地当量比 产量当量 产值当量 复种 间作 轮作
分 类 号:S344[农业科学—作物栽培与耕作技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249