论法规违宪审查建议权  

On Right of Suggestion for Reviewing of Unconstitutionality Regulation

作　　者：胡建淼[1] 金承东[2] 

机构地区：[1]浙江大学 [2]浙江大学法学院

出　　处：《法学家》2005年第2期133-139,共7页The Jurist

摘　　要：自《立法法》首次确立了"法规违宪审查建议权"后,该项权利的实践运用越来越频繁,并成为推动我国建立违宪审查制的强大动力。本文首先以现行规范为依据,分析了"法规违宪审查建议权" 的内涵及其要素;接着论证了"法规违宪审查建议权"不仅是对公民基本权利的具体化和现实化,更重要的是首次赋予了公民一定的启动法规违宪审查程序的权利。但这项权利在实践运用中也遭遇了一些困境,即建议案往往成为悬案,而且也无法当然启动法规违宪审查程序,建议者的预期目的往往落空。要摆脱这些困境,我们首先要对建议权建立回复机制,然后等改革积累到一定程度后,把建议权发展为诉权。Since the right of suggestion for reviewing an unconstitutional regulation was first prescribed by the Legislation Law, it has been exercised in practice more frequently, and become a large impetus to establish the judicial review system in China. The thesis makes an analysis of the connotation and elements of the right of suggestion for re- viewing unconstitutional regulations on the basis of the current norms; argues that this right not only specifies and actual- izes the fundamental rights of citizen, but entrusts citizens the right to initiate the procedure of reviewing unconstitutional regulations. Practically, however, some difficulties always exist in exercising it, that is to say, a bill of suggestion usual- ly becomes unsettled and surely has no way to start the procedure of reviewing an unconstitutional regulation, thus the proposer fails to attain the target expected. To extricate from the difficult situation, we should establish a system of reply to the right of suggestion, and develop it into a right of action when current reform accumulates to a certain extent.

关 键 词：建议权 法规 违宪审查程序 公民基本权利 实践运用 《立法法》 违宪审查制 预期目的 现实化 具体化 建议案 首先 诉权 

分 类 号：D921[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]