检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]复旦大学管理学院
出 处:《上海管理科学》2005年第2期20-23,共4页Shanghai Management Science
基 金:上海市高校优秀青年教师后备人选科研项日(03YQHB014)复旦大学文科科研推进计划金穗项目(03JS013)资助
摘 要:我国商家拒绝银行卡的罢刷行动与沃尔玛等商户集体诉讼Visa和Mastercard案均缘于商户、银行及银行卡组织的非合作博弈引发的利益冲突。本文在简单回顾银商之争历程后,从POS交易利益主体互动关系中剖析了银联组织的自然垄断特性及其造成的双重加价原理,并借鉴沃尔玛诉讼案的经验,基于产业组织理论从银联的结构性规制、银行卡市场的网络效应及价格听证等角度提出银商之争的若干解决思路。A combat between merchants and bank organization occurred in last year and provoked mass discussion in citizens and academia. Analogue to the case of class-action suit against Visa & MasterCard Co. leaded by Walmart, we find that conflict between merchants, issued bank and bank organization due to their uncooperative game is the main reason. This paper analysis the network effect and thus the characters of natural monopoly of bank organization, and the double markups of transaction fees setting by issued bank. This paper also give some suggestions for solutions to the combat between merchants and bank organization from the view point of the theory of industrial organization and the implications of the case of class-action suit against Visa& Master Card Co. . leaded by Walmart.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15