检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘民权[1] 徐忠[1] 俞建拖[1] 周盛武 赵英涛[3]
机构地区:[1]南京大学,江苏南京市210093 [2]中国银监会江苏监管局,江苏南京市210004 [3]国家开发银行南京分行,江苏南京市210000
出 处:《金融研究》2005年第4期99-113,共15页Journal of Financial Research
摘 要:自上个世纪90年代中期以来,中国的农村信用社经历了多次重大的改革。然而这些改革措施片面地注重农信社的产权及其内部治理结构等因素,却忽略了市场约束和竞争对塑造有活力的市场主体的必要性,因此难以很好地实现改革的预期目标。本文从农信社机构设立和业务经营的地理限制问题出发,提出了一个打破农信社业务经营的地理限制、促进农信社之间的竞争和兼并,从而强化市场约束的市场化改革设想,并对该设想的优势和潜在的问题以及可行性作了详细分析。China's Rural Credit cooperatives (RCCs) have experienced a series of important reforms since early 1990s. However, the earlier reforms mainly focused on establishing a system of property rights, governance and business management for the RCCs and less on utilizing market competitions and disciplines as leverages in the reform. As a result, the outcomes of these reforms did not meet the expectation. This paper proposes a new approach to RCCs' reform by introducing market forces and market disciplines. Specifically, it is argued that the existing strict geographical restrictions placed on RCCs' business operations should be gradually relaxed and eventually removed at all, so that RCCs can compete among themselves. It is argued that market competition will eventually force RCCs to improve their own internal governance and management systems. Finally, the paper also considers there are some potential problems when the new reform approach is being introduced, and argues that these problems can be overcome.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.182