检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陶建青[1] 石捷[1] 康红[1] 梁佳[1] 业明[1] 朱澜[1] 曾强[1]
出 处:《中国药房》2005年第9期678-679,共2页China Pharmacy
摘 要:目的研究利培酮与奎硫平治疗精神分裂症的经济学效果。方法将64例精神分裂症患者随机分为利培酮组(34例)与奎硫平组(30例),以简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)评分减少量来评价效果,以不良反应量表(TESS)评分评定不良反应,并进行成本-效果分析。结果利培酮组与奎硫平组人均成本分别为3598.85元、3778.63元,BPRS评分减少量分别为(36.09±15.52)、(25.03±14.45),成本-效果比分别为99.72元、150.96元,奎硫平组相对于利培酮组的增量成本-效果比为—16.25。结论治疗精神分裂症利培酮是较为经济的药物。OBJECTIVE:To study the econamics effect of risperidone and quetiapine in treating of schizophrenia.METH ODS:64schizophrenia patients were randomly divided into risperidone group(34cases)and quetiapine group(30cases).The effects were evaluated based on the reduction of scores determined by brief psychiatric rating scale(BPRS);the adverse effects were evaluated by treatment emergent symptom scale(TESS).And then the cost-effectiveness analysis was carried through.RESULTS:The per capita costs for risperidone and quetiapine were3598.85yuan and3778.63yuan respectively;the re-duction of BPRS scores were(36.09±15.52)and(25.03±14.45)respectvely;the respective cost-effect ratio was99.72yuan and150.96yuan;the increment of the cost-effect ratio for the quetiapine group was-16.25compared with the risperidone group.CONCLUSION:Risperidone is more economical than quetiapine in the treatment of schizophrenia.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.52