检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中山医科大学,广州市510080
出 处:《中国康复》1994年第4期172-174,共3页Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation
摘 要:研究将Douglas Carroll UEFT进行修订并进行信度和效度检验.从19名病人的资料中获得初步结果.UEFT的再测信度检验显示该表高度稳定(R=0.99,P<0.01);与Barthal指数有关上肢功能的项目和手臂稳定度等测量有较高的相关(R=0.70,R=0.84,P<0.01),在临床上,UEFT与WHO分级和Brunnstrom分级也高度相关(R=-0.95,R=0.89,P<0.01).研究表明UEFT确具有使用简便、实用、准确的优点,在治疗过程中能反映上肢功能的改变情况,为上肢功能诊断和评估提供了一种可靠的手段.This is a study to examine the reliability and validity of a revised Douglas Carroll Upper Extremity Function Test (UEFT). Preliminary result was obtained from 19 patients. A reliability re-test of UEFT showed that the test is highly reliable (R = 0. 99, P<0. 01). This is highly correlated with the upper extremity and arm stabillity subtests of Barthel index (R = 0. 70, R = 0. 84, P<0. 01). It is also highly correlated with WHO classification and Brunnstrom classification (R= -0. 95, R = 0. 89, P<0. 01). This study showed that UEFT has the advantages of being simple, practical and precise. It can be a reliable test reflecting the changes of upper extremity during clinical rehabilitation treatment in diagnosing and evaluating upper extremity functions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145