检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张骏[1]
出 处:《江南大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2005年第2期33-36,共4页Journal of Jiangnan University:Humanities & Social Sciences Edition
摘 要:法人本质问题自其产生之日起便被认为是一个悬而未决的法哲学问题。适值我国民法典草拟之际,为了更好地制定民法典中有关法人制度的部分,有必要对法人的本质问题进行深入的研讨,以便能更好地为我国法人制度的制定设定一个良好的基点。文章将从“法人拟制说”的角度阐明该问题,并且从“法人拟制说”的渊源流变,“法人拟制说”的理论优势以及“法人拟制说”与“法人实在说”的比较分析等方面,浅论法人本质问题。When the problem of nature of the legal person emerged, many people had made comment on it, but they couldn’t agree on it. People think this problem is a complicated problem of philosophy of law. As our country is making civil code draft, it is necessary to deliberate the nature of the legal person problem so that our country can set up a good order for the corporative institutional establishment.This paper clarifies this problem from the angle of the “imitation theory of the legal person”, and analyzes this problem from the history of “the imitation theory of the legal person”, the advantage of “the imitation theory of the legal person” and comparitive analysis of “imitation theroy of the legal person” and “theory of the real legal person”.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15