UBAF两种挂膜方式的试验研究  

Experimental Studies on Two Kinds of UBAF Start-up Methods

作　　者：周晴[1] 傅金祥[1] 赵玉华[1] 杨青[1] 陈正清[1] 

机构地区：[1]沈阳建筑大学市政与环境工程系,沈阳110015

出　　处：《工业安全与环保》2005年第5期28-30,共3页Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection

基　　金：辽宁省自然科学基金项目(20022007)

摘　　要：对复合式接种挂膜与自然挂膜两种挂膜方式进行比较,对两种挂膜方法下生物膜生长及对有机物和氨氮等指标的去除情况进行了测定和分析。结果表明,复合式接种挂膜可以加快曝气生物滤池的启动,7天后COD的去除率稳定在80%以上,启动时间比自然挂膜的UBAF滤柱缩短了7天,且该方式的一级C柱启动时间短,COD处理效果较好,二级C/N柱更利于硝化菌的生长和固定,NH3N去除率达到73.2%。Comparisons are conducted between two kinds of startup methods, such as compound startup with inoculum′s and the natural startup with incremental flow rate. The biomass attached to filter media and its biological performances during the startup are analyzed. The results demonstrate that the compound startup can shorten the startup time and removal rate of COD stays at over 80% in seven days from the startup, furthermore it can shorten the startup time in the first column and accelerate accumulation rates of nitro bacteria in the second filter column with 73.2% of the removal rate of NH 3N.

关 键 词：试验研究 曝气生物滤池 NH3-N 挂膜方法 启动时间 处理效果 复合式 去除率 COD 有机物 膜生长 时间比 硝化菌 C/N 接种 氨氮 

分 类 号：X703.3[环境科学与工程—环境工程]