检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]重庆医科大学附属儿童医院儿内科,重庆市400014
出 处:《中国全科医学》2005年第10期842-843,共2页Chinese General Practice
摘 要:目的 探讨循证护理在提高哮喘患儿吸入治疗疗效中的作用。方法 60例哮喘患儿随机分成两组, 循证护理组和常规护理组, 通过互联网和医院局域网, 围绕“吸入疗法”在医学专业数据库行循证证据查询, 主要应用吸入疗法进行哮喘防治, 并在初诊后1、3、6个月时进行复诊, 凡6个月后病情分级降1级以上为有效。结果 两组患儿吸入治疗技术正确率循证护理组为91 .9%, 常规护理组为65. 2%, 两组间差别有显著性意义(P<0 .05); 治疗后6个月两组患儿的病情分级间差别有显著性意义(P<0 .05)。结论 以循证护理思想为指导, 在一定周期内对哮喘患儿及其家长进行系统宣教, 能较好地提高患儿的吸入治疗正确率。Objective To observe the effect of eviden ce-based nursing and education on inhalation methods of children with asthma. Methods Sixty asthmatic children were divided randomly into tw o groups.In group one evidence-based nursing was introduced while in group two w ith routine nursing.Then medical evidences were carried out to find the effect o f evidence-based nursing on childhood asthma inhalation methods through Internet and intranet.Finally,all children were followed up to check whether the methods of inhalation were correct 1,3,and 6 months later.Those with one grade decreasi ng in clinical severity were effective.Results The percentage of correctness of inhalation methods was 91.9% in group one,65.2% in group two.There was significant difference be tween them.Conclusion It is helpful to carry out nursing an d education in asthmatic children and their parents periodically according to ev idence-based medicine.
关 键 词:哮喘患儿 循证护理 治疗疗效 吸入疗法 病情分级 医院局域网 专业数据库 循证证据 哮喘防治 治疗技术 常规护理 护理思想 系统宣教 吸入治疗 护理组 正确率 显著性 互联网 治疗后 差别
分 类 号:R725.622.5[医药卫生—儿科] R47[医药卫生—临床医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28