检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李世斌 陈永翀[2] 张祖奇 李武斌 黄真桂 郑龙荣 程达 黄桂美 许妙清 黄明坚
机构地区:[1]广西柳钢医院烧伤创疡治疗中心,广西柳州545002 [2]中国烧伤创疡科技中心,北京100053
出 处:《中国烧伤创疡杂志》2005年第2期103-106,共4页The Chinese Journal of Burns Wounds & Surface Ulcers
摘 要:目的:验证MEBT/MEBO在治疗小儿深度烧伤创面的临床疗效。方法:对具有可比性的60例小儿深度烧伤病例分为两组:实验组A组(MEBT/MEBO治疗组)30例,采用MEBT/MEBO方法治疗,对照组B组(传统治疗组)30例,采用磺胺嘧啶银(SD-Ag)霜治疗。效果:A组的疼痛程度、创面愈合时间、手术植皮例数、治疗过程并发症、瘢痕出现率均明显低于B组。结论:皮肤再生医疗技术治疗小儿深度烧伤创面修复中的临床疗效显著。Objective: To verify the clinical efficacy of MEBT/MEBO in treating pediatric deep burn wounds. Method; 60 children with deep burn were divided randomly into 2 groups. In group A, 30 children were treated with MEBT/MEBO and in group B, 30 children were treated with conventional surgical treatment. The efficacy of the 2 groups was compared. Result: The efficacy of MEBT/MEBO was better than conventional surgical treatment in terms of pain sensation, wound healing time, number of cases subjected to skin grafting, complication and scar formation rate, etc. The difference between the 2 groups was very significant (P<0. 01) . Conclusion: Skin regenerative medical technique is very effective in treating pediatric deep burn wounds. It is suitable to be popularized in grass - root hospitals.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.36