检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京航空航天大学经济管理学院,北京100083
出 处:《北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版)》2005年第2期15-19,共5页Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics:Social Sciences edition Edition
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(79800021)
摘 要:随着信息时代的到来,企业越来越多地利用电子沟通方式,而传统沟通方式———面对面的沟通,在某种程度上被人们所忽视。文章从知识的视角对电子沟通方式与传统面对面沟通方式的有效性进行了对比研究,试图明确现代沟通的知识本质。研究发现,在不同的任务类型下,两种沟通方式的有效性是不一样的,企业必须在考虑沟通效果的同时兼顾沟通效率,选择适宜的组织沟通方式,为企业的发展赢得核心竞争力。<Abstrcat> With the arrival of the information age, enterprises are increasingly using computer-mediated communication ways in their routine business and the traditional ways of communication, mostly face to face communication, are to some extent overlooked. This paper studies the effectivity of computer-mediated communication and traditional face-to face communication based on knowledge, with the purpose of gaining an insight into the knowledge nature of modern communication. The study shows that the effectivity of the two communication ways varies with the task types. Enterprises must take both communication effect and communication effectivity into account, on which to base their choice of appropriate communication way. Thus they could generate the core competing competence for the enterprises.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.157