检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]重庆市肺科医院,400020 [2]重庆市结核病防治所
出 处:《临床肺科杂志》2005年第4期453-454,共2页Journal of Clinical Pulmonary Medicine
摘 要:目的比较重庆市城区和偏远山区复治耐多药肺结核接受以KPO1321为主的抗痨方案疗效的差异。方法回顾性总结91例复治耐多药患者接受该方案试疗3~6月的痰菌阴转率,比较两者的差异。结果城区50例,3月痰菌阴转率为44%,6月为66%;偏远山区41例,3月痰菌阴转率为73.17%,6月为85.36%,二者比较有显著性差异。结论偏远山区复治耐多药肺结核对该方案的疗效明显优于城区。Objective To compare the clinical efficacy between the city area and the secluded mountain area with the project of KOPTH 1321 in treating MDR-TB. Methods A total of 91 patients with MDR-TB treated for 3~6 months with the drugs. Results The sputum M. tuberculosis clearance rates were 44% in the city and 73.17% in the mountain area after 3 months (P<0.01), 66% in the city and 85.36% in the mountain area (P<0.05) after 6 months. There were singnificant differences in the two groups in the rate comparisons.Conclusion The clinical efficacy of MDR-TB in secluded mountain area is better than that in the city area.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117