检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872 [2]南京师范大学公共管理学院,江苏南京210046
出 处:《贵州大学学报(社会科学版)》2005年第3期86-92,共7页Journal of Guizhou University(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目<证券欺诈的民事责任及其法律救济制度研究>(课题编号:02CFX005)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:证券争议仲裁是证券市场中争议解决的基本途径之一,其具有更加全面、高效地保护投资者合法权益和缓解法院受案压力、促进多元化证券争议解决机制建立的价值功效。然而,由于观念、体制和立法等因素的影响,我国证券争议仲裁制度在实践中难以发挥其应有的作用。本文在全面分析证券争议仲裁制度现状及其价值功效的基础上,从探讨证券争议仲裁制度作用虚化现象产生的根源入手,试图提出完善我国证券争议仲裁制度的立法对策,以期促进我国诸多证券争议的早日解决和保障证券市场健康、有序的发展。Securities arbitration is one method to solve the dispute in the stock market. It can protect the investor's rights completely and effectively, to alleviate the press of the court and to form the variegated methods to solve the disputes. However, in fact, due to the influence of the defects of the idea, the structure, the legislation and so on, the securities arbitration has difficulty in being effective in China. Based on an all-round analysis of the security arbitration system and its value, the present paper, by focusing on the security arbitration in effectiveness as the point of departure, attempts to put forward the legislative countermeasures to protect and perfect healthy and orderly development and the securities arbitration system in China as early as possible.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.198.133