检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张建芳[1] 吕玉真 徐惠南[1] 李巧云[1] 方震[1] 王玉琪 林基丛
出 处:《中国医药工业杂志》1994年第6期257-260,共4页Chinese Journal of Pharmaceuticals
摘 要:比较了每12h口服自制磷酸丙吡胺缓释片和对照胶囊各200mg后的稳态血药浓度及波动系数(FI%)。测求稳态时Cmax:CminTmax和血药浓度时间曲线下面积(AUC0-12),结果显示两制剂Tmax、FI%有极显著差异,Cmin有显著差异而Cmax、AUC0-12并无显著差异。缓释片具明显的缓释效果,然而生物利用度与胶囊剂相当。The steady-state serum concentrations and fluctuation index(FI%) have been studied in 10 healthy male volunteers by crossover design following multiple doses of 200 mg in immediate capsules(IC) and sustained-release tablets(SRT).Disopyramide serum concentrations were determined by FPIA method.The highly significant difference(p<0.01) of Tmax and FI%,the significant difference(p<0.05) of Cmin were shown between the IC and SRT.But no practical differences(p>0.05) were observed in Cmax and AUC0-12 between the two preparations.The bioavailability was similiar in these dosage forms.It could suggest that SRT possessed a better sustained-release property.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28