主观超过因素新论  

作　　者：董玉庭[1] 

机构地区：[1]黑龙江大学法学院

出　　处：《法学研究》2005年第3期62-79,共18页Chinese Journal of Law

摘　　要：主客观相统一的定罪原则并不否定主观超过因素的存在。无论大陆法系刑法抑或英美法系刑法基本都认可主观超过因素的定罪意义。所谓主观超过因素是指在构成犯罪的各要素中,超出故意内涵之外的主观要素,其中主要包括目的犯中的犯罪目的及倾向犯中的内心倾向。对于表现犯中的内心表现完全应该作为犯罪故意的内容,不宜按主观超过因素来对待。在司法实践中,由于主观超过因素存在与否的判断极为艰难,因此必须坚持弱化口供,强化推定及强化证伪的认定原则。The conviction rule of the unification of subjectivity and objectivity do not deny the existence of over subjective factors. Both Civil Law System and Common Law System recognize the significance of over subjective factor for conviction. The over subjective factor is the subjective elements which go beyond the intentional meaning. It mainly includes the main object in motive crime and the inner trend in orientation crime. The inner status in expressive crime cannot be consider as the over subjective factor, instead, it should be a part of intent. It is difficult to tell whether the over subjective factors exist in practice; therefore, some judicial rules should be emphasized.

关 键 词：新论 定罪原则 英美法系 大陆法系 主观要素 犯罪目的 犯罪故意 司法实践 认定原则 相统一 目的犯 刑法 内心 作为 口供 推定 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]