两种方法治疗脑梗死的疗效比较  

Comparison of Curative Effect of Two Kinds of Therapies for Treating Cerebral Infarction

作　　者：姜琴[1] 何国城 

机构地区：[1]广东省惠州市中心医院理疗科,516001 [2]广东省惠州中医院功能科

出　　处：《医学理论与实践》2005年第6期636-637,共2页The Journal of Medical Theory and Practice

摘　　要：目的:脑梗死患者不同治疗方法疗效比较。方法:67例患者分为ILIB组和UDIO组,分别采用全电脑氦氖激光血管内照射仪和全电脑光量子载体氧透射治疗仪治疗,并观察治疗前后血脂、血浆超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、血浆脂质过氧化物(LPO),血浆丙二醛(MDA)等物质含量的变化。结果:UDIO组在降低红细胞压积、血二氧化碳分压、LPO及MDA,提高血氧分压,血氧饱和度、升高HDL、激活SOD酶方面优于ILIB组,而在改善血流变方面不及ILIB组;2组脑梗死患者基本痊愈分别为13(37.1%),10(31.2%);显著进步分别为10(28.5%),8(25.0%);进步为10(28.5%),10(31.2%);无变化分别为2(5.7%),4(12.5%);总有效率分别为33(94.2%),28(87.5%)。结论:紫外线照射充氧液体输注法能防止脂质过氧化的加重,操作简便,感染机会少。Objective:To compare the curative effect in brain infarct by of two kinds methods.Methods: The contents of SOD, LPO, MDA and blood fat were observed in 67 patients with brain infarct by whole computer helium neon and whole computer light quantum oxygen transmission treatment instrument.Result: The contents of red cell press, PCO_2 , LPO and MDA were lower in group of UDIO; The contents of change of blood oxygen press, saturated degree, blood flow in group of UDIO were exceled group of ILIB;The rate of basic heal were 13(37.1%) and 10(31.2%);The markedness Progress were 10(28.5%)and 8(25.0%);progress were 10(28.5%),10(31.2%);the no-change were 2(5.7%),4(12.5%);the general efficiency were 33(94.2%),28(87.5%) in brain infarct.Conclusion: The method of UDIO can prevent the fit quality to oxidize of increase, operate simple,the infection were little.

关 键 词：疗效比较 超氧化物歧化酶(SOD) 紫外线照射充氧液体输注 光量子载体氧透射 血浆脂质过氧化物 丙二醛(MDA) 血二氧化碳分压 脑梗死患者 血管内照射仪 UDIO 治疗仪治疗 红细胞压积 血氧饱和度 治疗方法 氦氖激光 治疗前后 

分 类 号：R683.42[医药卫生—骨科学] R285.5[医药卫生—外科学]