检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国中西医结合肾病杂志》2005年第6期342-343,共2页Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Nephrology
基 金:湛江市科技攻关项目 [No .湛江 (2 0 0 4) 73号 ]
摘 要:目的:比较两种不同治疗尿路结石方案的疗效,提供临床选择,以开辟新的治疗方法,从而提高尿路结石的治愈率。方法:将10 8例患者随机分成治疗组和对照组。A组5 6例为治疗组,用中西医结合治疗,给予自拟排石方,每日1剂,配合消石素(德国产) 1粒/次,每日2次,加一般治疗(体液疗法及调整饮食)。B组5 2例为对照组,口服消石素加一般治疗,方法同A组,观察疗效。结果:A组治愈率73.2 1% ,B组治愈率36 .5 4 % ,A组疗效优于B组,表现为结石排出时间较B组短,治愈率较高。结论:中西医结合的疗效好,明显提高尿路结石治愈率。Objective:To compare the effects of two different therapy of urinary tract calculi.Methods:108 cases with urinary tract calculi were divided into two groups.Group A,56 cases,were treated with one courses of paishifang,following with pharmastone(made in germany)and commonly treat.Group B,52 cases,as a control group,were treated only with pharmastone and commonly treat.Results:The overall stone-free rate of group A was 73.21%,and it was 36.54% in group B.Stone of group A was quickly released than group B.Conclusion:The therapy Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine is better,and it can improve the overall stone-free rate.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28