检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国针灸》2005年第4期261-262,共2页Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion
摘 要:目的:比较浮针与体针治疗膝关节疼痛的疗效。方法:将96例膝关节疼痛患者随机分为治疗组48例,采用浮针刺法治疗,对照组48例,采用体针治疗。结果:治疗组治愈率66.7%,对照组39.6%(X2=7.06,P<0.01),差异有非常显著性意义。两组总有效率均为100.0%。从治疗次数上看,浮针所需次数比体针次数明显减少(X2=5.25,P<0.05),差异有显著性意义。结论:浮针治疗本病疗效好,疗程短。Objective To compare therapeutic effects of superficial needling and body acupuncture on knee joint pain. Methods Ninety-six cases of knee joint pain were randomly divided into a treatment group of 48 cases treated with superficial needling, and a control group of 48 cases treated with body acupuncture. Results The cured rate was 66. 7% in the treatment group and 39. 6% in the control group with a significant difference between the two groups (P<0. 01). The total effective rate was 100. 0% in both the two groups. The needed therapeutic times of superficial needling was significantly less than that of the body acupuncture (P<0. 05). Conclusion Superficial needling has a good therapeutic effect on knee joint pain with a shorter therapeutic course.
分 类 号:R246.2[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3