检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]锦州医学院附属第一医院泌尿外科,辽宁锦州121001
出 处:《锦州医学院学报》2005年第2期34-36,共3页Journal of Jinzhou Medical College
摘 要:目的 比较同种异系抗原通过不同途径接种后机体对该抗原免疫反应状态的变化,探讨口服耐受的机制。方法 以SD大鼠为供者,Wistar大鼠为受者,将SD大鼠脾细胞,分别以口服、联合(口服+门静脉注射)两种途径接种于Wistar大鼠,测定供受体之间单向混合淋巴细胞培养(MLC)和受体对供体抗原的迟发性超敏反应(DTH)。结果 两种途径与对照组相比MLC (A)、DTH脚掌厚度增值均显著降低,其差异有显著性(P<0 .0 5 )。结论 两种途径均可诱导机体对该抗原的免疫低反应性。Objective To compare the change of the level of immunoreactions to allogeneic cells after receiving inoculation by the different approaches with allogeneic cells in rats,and to study the mechanism of oral tolerance. Methods SD and Wistar rats were used as donors and recipients respectively,and splenocytes from SD were inoculated into Wistar by taking orally and injection via portal vein combined with taking orally.Mixed lymphocyte culture(MLC) of Wistar to SD rats alloantigens was investigated and anti-SD delayed-type hypersensitivity(DTH) responses assessed by directly challenging SD splenocytes. Results The two revulsive approaches significantly abolished the capability of the animals to develop MLC responses and DTH responses to SD alloantigens as induced by the subcutaneous immunization(P<0.05 ) . Conclusions The two revulsive approaches could induce low immunoreaction to alloantigens.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.198