检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李平[1]
出 处:《中国工业经济》2005年第6期46-51,119,共7页China Industrial Economics
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目"后产业组织时代我国市场垄断与反垄断问题研究"(批准号03BJY050)
摘 要:“抑制规模垄断、促进市场竞争活力”是各国产业组织政策长期以来致力于解决的问题,也是产业组织理论研究的核心问题。结构学派和效率学派的主要分歧正是在抑制集中度,重视结构绩效和忽略集中度,追求行为效率方面各有侧重。今天,经济全球化和活跃的技术变革,改变着市场边界和市场竞争关系,单纯的大规模不再构成市场垄断的主要力量,我们进入了后产业组织时代。新时期的竞争关系和市场垄断特征,应该是我国正在制定中的反垄断法的主要依据。Restraining scale economy to accelerate dynamic of market competition is a long-term problem not only in all the countires' industrial organization polcies, but also in the research of industrial organization theory. The main divergence between structural school and efficiency school is emphasizing different particularly on restraining concentration rate, attaching importance to strctural performance but neglecting concentration and pursuing conduct efficiency. Nowadays, the relationship between market boundary and market competition is being changed by economic globalization and animate technology innovation. Under this circumstance, large scale is not the only power to achieve market monopoly any more, we are entering post-industrial organization era. Legislating monoploy law in China today should be arrcording to new competition relations and new features in monopoly market.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3