检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]第二军医大学长海医院肛肠外科,上海市200433
出 处:《中华护理杂志》2005年第6期421-423,共3页Chinese Journal of Nursing
摘 要:目的比较两种腹带治疗肠造口旁疝的效果。方法将36例肠造口旁疝患者分为两组,造口腹带组20例,普通腹带组16例。比较治疗后1个月的效果。结果造口腹带组有15例(75.0%)、普通腹带组有3例(18.8%)1个月后能坚持使用腹带。造口腹带对于减轻造口周围不适症状、防止体形改变、减少造口袋渗漏等均优于普通腹带(P<0.01)。结论肠造口旁疝非手术治疗时,佩戴造口腹带比佩戴普通腹带更有效。Objective To c ompare the result of two kinds of abdominal belt on tr eatment of parastomal hernia.Methods 36 cases of parastomal hernia were divide d into two groups, including routine abdominal belt group 16 cases, ostomy abdom inal belt group 20 cases.Results 15 patients(75.0% ) and 3 patients(18.8%) can keep on using abdominal belt in ostomy abdominal belt group and routine abdominal be lt gro up respectively. Compared with routine abdominal belt, ostomy abdominal belt gro up was mor e effective in relieving discomfort around the stoma, avoiding change in body ty pe and decreasing appliance leakage(P<0.01).Conclusions Ostomy abdominal belt is better than routine abdominal belt in the non-operative treatment of parasto mal hernia.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33