检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杜昭琳[1] 孙迎红[1] 康红梅[1] 程建玲[1]
机构地区:[1]山东省立医院肿瘤研究治疗中心,济南250000
出 处:《上海针灸杂志》2005年第5期9-10,共2页Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
摘 要:目的 观察穴位注射对肿瘤患者化疗后白细胞减少的影响。方法 将300例患者随机分成两组,治疗组取0. 6ml粒细胞集落刺激因子行双侧血海穴位注射,对照组则取相同剂量行上臂三角肌皮下注射,每日1次,连续3次为1个疗程,并于注射后3、5、7日复查外周血白细胞计数。结果与结论 两种治疗方法对化疗3疗程以内,患者治疗后第3、5日白细胞升高程度无明显差异,而第7日治疗组的白细胞计数明显高于对照组(P<0.05);化疗疗程过半后,治疗组患者外周血白细胞计数明显高于对照组,且对照组患者在治疗后5-7日的细胞计数仍未升至正常。表明穴位注射与皮下注射相比,提升白细胞速度快,维持时间长久,治疗组不良反应明显少于对照组。Objective To investigate the effect of point injection on post-chemotherapeutic leukopenia. Methods Three hundred patients were randomly divided into two groups. In the treatment group, 0.6 ml granulocyte colony stimulating factor was injected into bilateral points Xuehai and in the control group, the same dose subcutaneously into the deltoid muscle in the upper arm, once daily, three consecutive times as a course of treatment. A peripheral leukocyte count was examined at 3, 5 and 7 days after injection. Results and Conclusion Under three courses of chemotherapy, there was no significant difference in leukocyte increase between the two methods at 3 and 5 days after treatment but a leukocyte count was significantly higher at 7 days in the treatment group than in the control group (P< 0.05) . After over half courses of chemotherapy, a peripheral leukocyte count was significantly higher in the treatment group than in the control group (P<0.05) and it did not rise to normal at 5-7 days after treatment in the control group. It is showed that point injection raises leukocyte quickly and kept the effect long in comparison with subcutaneous injection and the adverse responses were significantly less in the treatment group than in the control group.
分 类 号:R246.5[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222