《文献通考·经籍考》广纳群说的文化取向  

The Cultrual Tendency in Seeking Comments From All Sidesof A Critical History of Institutions·Confucian Classics Kao

作　　者：杨寄林[1] 董文武[1] 

机构地区：[1]河北师范大学历史文化学院,河北石家庄050091

出　　处：《华中师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2004年第6期136-141,共6页Journal of Central China Normal University:Humanities and Social Sciences

摘　　要：《文献通考·经籍考》通过广纳群说而在中国文献学史上完整地创立起辑录体解题。它把诸家书目所评尤其是名流议论纳入既定的对四部群书“纪著作本末 ,考流传真伪 ,订文理纯驳”的内容层面与轨道上 ,锐意对儒家经典辨惑证真 ,对史林要籍指瑜摘瑕 ,对诸子名著括要发覆 ,对文坛杰作抉奥阐幽 ,藉此径为读者、学人提供了丰实的导读之资和学术依凭 ,实现了传统文献提要学的重大突破 ,显示出异常鲜明的文化取向。A Critical History of Institutions·Confucian Clas sics Kao completely established the summary of compilatory style by seeking commen ts from all sides in the history of bibliography. In Kao , all kinds of title catal ogues,particularly,the comments of distinguished personages were brought into th e surface and orbit of the content, which included recording the whole composing process, distinguishing between the true and the false in handing down, measuri ng whether the unity and coherence in writing of every book in the four bibliogr aphic divisions, fixed by the writer. The writer had a strong determination to d istinguish the classics of confucians school between the true and the false, to pick out the essence and the flaws of the significant records in historical circ les, to summarize the main points of famous works of various schools, to probe i nto profound truth of masterpieces in literary arena. By the way the writer prov ided abundant documents as guidance to read and academic dependent for reader a nd scholars. Otherwise it made a great breakthrough in the study on the summary of documents, and show the quite distinct cultural tendency.

关 键 词：广纳群说 辑录体解题 文化取向 文献提要学 

分 类 号：G257[文化科学—图书馆学]