在真实与虚构之间——试探历史剧如何对待历史真实  

作　　者：刘丽霞[1] 

机构地区：[1]厦门大学中文系

出　　处：《和田师范专科学校学报》2005年第1期94-95,共2页Journal of Hotan Normal College

摘　　要：本文试图探讨历史剧在对待历史真实与艺术虚构上如何把握的问题。在这个问题上,西方亚里士多德、莱辛、黑格尔等都提出过自己的观点;中国历史上是从二十世纪六十年代才始有集中的论争,特别是吴晗和李希凡两种较具有影响的观点。本文通过分析八十年代末的历史剧《曹操与杨修》并结合史料,提出历史剧四分法:学者型、大众型、讽喻借鉴型、文人型。This text is about the issue that how Chronicle Play treats the relation of the reality of the history and the makeup of the art. To this question , Aristotle , Lessing, Hegel and so on who were occidental all had put forward their viewpoint; It was in the 60s of last century that there was centralized contest, especially Wuhan and Lixifan whose standpoints were influential. The author of this text analyzes the Chronicle Play of <Caocao and Yangxiu> and combines the historical materials. The author bring forward that the Chronicle Play could be detached four sorts: Scholar Play, Populace Play, Parable Play and Literator Play.

关 键 词：历史真实 历史剧 对待 二十世纪六十年代 《曹操与杨修》 亚里士多德 艺术虚构 中国历史 八十年代 黑格尔 李希凡 学者型 四分法 大众型 莱辛 论争 文人 

分 类 号：I207.3[文学—中国文学] K29[历史地理—历史学]