家居和老年公寓老人生活质量对比分析  

Comparison of quality of Life in the elderly living at home and at lodgings

作　　者：江琴普[1] 孙东[1] 苏顺英[1] 刘杰[1] 李建峰[1] 

机构地区：[1]河北省精神卫生中心,071000

出　　处：《上海精神医学》2005年第2期78-79,共2页Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry

摘　　要：目的了解家居和老年公寓老年人的生活幸福度和生活质量。方法采用整群抽样的方法,随机抽取城市社区和老年公寓60岁以上老人300人,用总体幸福感量表、生活质量综合评定问卷进行调查。结果居住于社区家庭的老年人个人和家庭的经济收入、人均住房面积明显高于老年公寓的老人(p=0.00);老年公寓老人的精神紧张度和情绪波动明显高于居住于社区者(p=0.00);生活质量总体评价、总体幸福感等方面两者无显著性差异。结论老年公寓是一种可取的社会化养老方式,但仍有多项因子分显示老年公寓的老人低于社区老人,老年人的养老观念和养老方式仍趋向于社区家庭。Objective: To investigate happiness grade and quality of life of old persons living at home and at lodgings in Baoding . Methods: 300 old persons aged over 60 years at home or at lodgings were selected randomly and the quality of life was assessed with General Well-Being Schedule(GWB) and Generic Quality of Life Inventory-74(GQLI-74) .Results:The income and living conditions of subjects at home were higher (p=0.00).There were more psychological tension and unstable emotion of subjects at lodgings(p=0.00).There were no difference of scores on positive affect,self-esteem,health satisfaction rating ,generic quality of life inventory,general well-being between the two groups . Conclusion:The better way for supporting the elderly intended to be living at home.

关 键 词：老年公寓 对比分析 家居 生活质量综合评定问卷 总体幸福感量表 社区家庭 养老方式 60岁以上 显著性差异 老年人 整群抽样 城市社区 经济收入 情绪波动 总体评价 社区老人 养老观念 幸福度 紧张度 社会化 因子分 居住 

分 类 号：R195[医药卫生—卫生统计学]