同时检测抗SSA和抗RNP在诊断结缔组织病中的意义  被引量:1

Clinical significance of combined determinaton of antiSSA and antiRNP in diagnosis of connective tissue disease

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:史丽璞[1] 梁永峰 窦丽芳[1] 张倩[1] 肖红[3] 

机构地区:[1]新乡市中心医院,河南新乡453000 [2]新乡县计生委指导站,河南新乡453000 [3]平原大学医务室,河南新乡453003

出  处:《新乡医学院学报》2005年第3期240-241,共2页Journal of Xinxiang Medical University

摘  要:目的探讨抗SSA和抗RNP在结缔组织病中出现的机率。方法采用双免疫扩散法(ID)和免疫印迹法(IBT)同时检测抗SSA和抗RNP。结果用ID法检测系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者抗SSA阳性率远高于抗RNP(P<0.05),混合性结缔组织病患者中抗RNP阳性率l00%高于抗SSA的19%(P<0.001),结缔组织病患者中抗SSA阳性率82.8%亦远高于抗RNP的14.1%(P<0.05)。结论ID法比IBT法检测抗SSA较全面,使用ID法和IBT法同时检测抗SSA和抗RNP,可以提高临床诊断的正确性,减少漏诊。Objective To assess the significance of combined determination of antiSSA and antiRNP in diagnosis of connective tissue disease.Methods The antiSSA and antiRNP were measured by immunodiffusion (ID) and immunoblotting technique (IBT) at the same time.Results The positive rate of antiSSA was higher than that of antiRNP in systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE)(P<0.05).The positive rate of antiRNP was 100% in mixed connective tissue disease and higher than that of antiSSA(P<0.001).The positive rate of antiSSA was 82.8% ,and higher than that of anti RNP(14.1%,) in connective tissue disease(P<0.05).Conclusion The methed of ID is better than IBT to measure antiSSA, combined antiSSA and antiRNP by ID and IBT at the same time can improve clinical diagnosis,to avoid misdiagnosis.

关 键 词:免疫双扩散法 免疫印迹法 抗SSA 抗RNP 

分 类 号:R593.2[医药卫生—内科学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象