检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国实用护理杂志》2005年第7期17-18,共2页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
摘 要:目的探讨更适合老年静脉滴注患者拔针后按压针口的新方法,以提高护理质量,最大限度减轻患者的损伤。方法将1796例老年静脉滴注患者随机分成两组,拔针后采用新方法按压针口为实验组;采用传统方法按压针口为对照组,即只用消毒棉签按压针口约5~10min的方法。0.5h后对比两组方法所得结果及患者对新方法的满意程度。结果将实验组与对照组的护理质量进行比较,有统计学意义(P<0.01);采用新方法后患者满意度达到99.1%,无一例不满意。结论实验组的护理质量远超过对照组,新方法有临床应用价值。Objective To discuss the new method of pressing the pin hole after vein infusion which is most suitable for the elderly patients, and improve the quality of nursing treatment and reduce the injury farthest. Methods Randomly divide 1 796 patients into two groups, in which the new method of pressing the pin hole after pulling out the pin that will be described in the following text is treatment group, while the traditional method of pressing the pin hole by an disinfectant stick for about five to ten minutes is provided to the control group. Then compare the two nursing results after half an hour, and survey on the patients′ satisfaction degree. Results Comparing the nursing results of treatment team and control team, we found statistic relations between them (P<0.01). The satisfaction degree of new method reaches to 99.1%, and no case has dissatisfaction. Conclusion The nursing effect of treatment group is remarkable higher than that of control group. It is a valuable nursing method in clinic application.
关 键 词:拔针后按压 静脉滴注 新方 老年 护理质量 临床应用价值 患者满意度 实验组 对照组 最大限度 传统方法 满意程度 组方法 统计学 不满意
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3