腰麻-硬膜外联合阻滞应用于急诊剖宫产手术的临床观察  

Clinical Study of Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia for Emergency Cesarean Section

作　　者：许华强[1] 郑少霞[1] 李莉[1] 许顺发[1] 

机构地区：[1]汕头大学医学院第二附属医院,广东汕头515041

出　　处：《河北医学》2005年第7期601-603,共3页Hebei Medicine

摘　　要：目的:探讨腰麻-硬膜外联合阻滞(CSEA)用于急诊剖宫产手术的应用效果。方法:选择ASAⅠ～Ⅱ级急诊行剖宫产的产妇100例,随机分成腰-硬联合麻组和单纯硬膜外(EA)组各50例,对两组产妇的麻醉起效时间、麻醉至胎儿娩出时间(IDI)、手术时间、麻醉效果、局麻药用量、麻醉前后血流动力学变化、新生儿评分及不良反应进行比较分析。结果:CSEA组麻醉起效时间、IDI、手术时间均短于EA组(P<0.05),麻醉效果明显优于EA组(P<0.05),局麻药用量显著减少(P<0.01),但低血压发生率较EA组大(P<0.05),其他不良反应未见统计学差异。结论:CESA比EA麻醉起效更快、效果更确切,是急诊剖宫产更为可取的麻醉选择。Objective: To study the clinical efficiency of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) in patients undergoing emergency cesarean section. Methods: 100 ASA Ⅰ～Ⅱ patients undergoing emergency cesarean section were randomly divided into two groups : CSEA group(50 cases) and continuous epidural anesthesia (EA) group(50 cases).The anesthesia inducement time,the incison to delivery interval (IDI),the operative duration,the quality of anesthesia,the dosage of anesthesia agents,the change of vital signs, the side effects and neonatal state(Apgar)were observed. Results: The operative duration ,IDI and the anesthesia inducement in CSEA group were much shorter than that of EA group(P<0.05). The effect of anesthesia in CSEA group was much better than that of EA group(P<0.05), and much less local anesthesia agents was used(P<0.01).Although the possibility of hypotension was higher in CSEA group, there were not obvious differences between two groups in neonatal Apgar score and other side effects. Conclusion: CESA has faster inducement and greater efficiency with a good foreground for clinical application in emergency cesarean section.

关 键 词：腰麻-硬膜外联合阻滞 硬膜外阻滞 剖宫产 

分 类 号：R614[医药卫生—麻醉学]