检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《农业现代化研究》2005年第3期229-232,共4页Research of Agricultural Modernization
摘 要:中国林业资源贫瘠已成为不争的事实,公共财政对林业支持的不充分性,在很大的程度上,是导致我国林业资源禀赋贫瘠的重要制度性因素之一。“绿箱”政策是规范一国财政支持农林业发展的国际性规则,在加入WTO后,我们必须依据“绿箱”政策创新我国的公共财政政策,以塑造出崭新的林业新经济。机遇摆在面前,关键在于把握。在简单地讨论了我国林业资源禀赋的贫瘠状况之后,本文依据制度经济学、公共选择理论的逻辑分析了我国公共财政对林业支持不充分性的原因,最后,本文提出了运用“绿箱”政策,优化我国林业资源禀赋的一些初步构想。It has been a generally acknowledged fact that natural endowment of China forestry resources is poor. China forestry sector enjoys insufficient support from public finance policy and to a great extent, which becomes an important institutional factor leading to the poor natural endowment of China forestry resources during a long period.'Green Box Policies'are international agreements that standardize a country'sfinancial policy accelerating its agriculture as well as forestry.After being a member state of WTO, we have to perfect our public financial policy according to'Green Box Policies', so that China may mold a new forestry economics. At present what counts is to grasp the opportunity confronting us right away. The poor natural endowment of China forestry resources is briefly discussed at the beginning and then, the reasons that China government doesn't pour sufficient money into forestry sector are analyzed in line with the logic of the new institutional economics and public choice theory. Some tentative ideas on how to make full use of 'Green Box Policies'to optimize the natural endowment of China forestry resources are eventually put forward.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31