检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《医药导报》2005年第7期636-637,共2页Herald of Medicine
摘 要:目的评价3种不同药物治疗抑郁症的经济效果.方法对98例抑郁症患者随机分组,分别用3种不同的药物治疗,A组33例给予氟西汀20 mg·d-1,B组33例给予文拉法辛50~200 mg·d-1,C组32例给予阿米替林50~200 mg·d-1,3组均为口服给药,疗程8周.运用药物经济学成本-效果分析方法比较.结果 A、B、C组的显效率分别为75.76%,87.88%,75.00%. B组方案成本-效果比较低,显效率较高.结论应用文拉法辛治疗抑郁症为较佳方案.Objective To evaluate the cost-effectiveness in the treatment of depression with three different drugs. Methods Ninety eight depression patients were randomly divided into three groups.Group A (33 cases) fluoxetine 20 mg·d -1 , group B(33 cases) venlafaxine 50-200 mg·d -1 , and group C (32 cases) amitriptyline 50-200 mg·d -1 . All the drugs were administrated orally for 8 weeks. Results The effective rates of group A,B and C were 75.76%,87.88%and 75.00%, respectively. Group B had a lower cost-effectiveness ratio and higher effective rate. Conclusion Venlafaxineis superior than the other two drugs in the treatment of depression.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.143