两种加药进针方法对胶塞碎屑形成的影响  

Clinical Observation for Rubber Cork Chip Formed by Two Different Acupunctures Entering Methods to Add Medicine

作　　者：郑文静[1] 崔秀梅[1] 欧梅娇[1] 胡小平[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东医学院附属医院输液室,广东湛江524001

出　　处：《护理学杂志》2005年第13期6-7,共2页

摘　　要：目的观察加药时两种不同进针方法对胶塞碎屑形成的影响,寻求减少胶塞碎屑形成的方法。方法将门诊输液加药1200次,随机分成两组,传统法(573次)采用垂直进针法加药;改进法(627次)采用针尖斜面向上,针梗与瓶塞呈70～80°角进针法加药。观察两种加药方法胶塞碎屑形成率,在同等条件下两种方法操作所需时间以及护理人员发生针刺伤的情况。结果改进法胶塞碎屑的形成率比传统组显著降低(P<0.01),两法操作所需时间及护理人员针刺伤发生率比较,差异无显著性意义(均P>0.05)。结论在没有增加操作时间和护理人员针刺伤的前提下,改进加药法能显著降低胶塞碎屑的形成。Objective To observe the quantity of rubber cork chip formed by two different acupunctures entering methods to add medicine and seek practical method to reduce rubber cork chip formation. Methods One thousand and two hundred times of adding medicine for clinical patient transfusion were divided into two groups at random, 573 times as traditional group (vertical acupuncture entering method), and 627 times as innovation group (the end of needle leftward and the slope of needle tip upward, needle stick and bottle cover with 70-80° angle), so as to observe the formation of rubber cork chip, time needed for two groups in different conditions, nurse injured by needle and two adding medicine methods. Results The ratio of rubber cork chip formation in innovation group was apparently lower than in traditional group (P<0.01). There was significant difference in time needed and the nurse injured by needle between two methods (all P>0.05). Conclusion The modified medicine-added method can apparently reduce the formation rate of rubber cork chip without prolonging operation time and injures of the nurses by needle.

关 键 词：加药 进针方法 胶塞碎屑 

分 类 号：R472[医药卫生—护理学]