检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海体育学院体育社会学系,上海200438 [2]南京师范大学体育科学学院,江苏南京210097
出 处:《上海体育学院学报》2005年第3期4-7,16,共5页Journal of Shanghai University of Sport
基 金:国家哲学社会科学基金资助项目(02BTY010)
摘 要:运用法学理论分析了职业足球俱乐部间"纠纷"的典型案例。指出了中国足球协会章程中关于纠纷解决规定的缺陷,如设立诉讼委员会无依据、剥夺成员的诉权、中国足球协会自己当法官等。提出应建立、健全符合公正和效益价值的程序机制,即完善中国足球协会内部纠纷解决机制、尽快建立体育仲裁机构、重视体育调解等。The law theory was used to analyze the typical cases of the disputes among professional football clubs. It pointed out the defects existing in the regulation of solving disputes in the constitution of the Chinese Football Association, such as: setting up a lawsuit committee without any basis, depriving the lawsuit right of the members, the Chinese Football Association made itself be a judge, etc., and put forward that it's necessary to establish and sound the procedure mechanism of conforming to justice and beneficial value, i.e. improving the mechanism of the solution to internal disputes of the Chinese Football Association, establishing a sports arbitration organ as soon as possible, paying high attention to sports mediation and so on.
分 类 号:G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学] G843[文化科学—体育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70