检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁良骏[1]
出 处:《汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2005年第3期8-12,27,共6页Journal of Shantou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:中国现代文学的“两个翅膀论”,支持、呼应者颇多,但实际上是一个似是而非的错误理论。为什么说它似是而非?因为两个翅膀比一个翅膀好,这就是它的“似是”,它的幌子,而它的实质则在贬损、否定“五四”新文学,为“鸳蝴派”翻案,拉中国文学向后转。其次,“两个翅膀论”故意在严肃文学、通俗文学与低俗文学之间制造混乱,故意曲解“五四”新文学一步步民族化、通俗化,雅俗共赏的历史,为低俗文学鸣锣开道。There are many supporters of the theory of “the Two Wings', but this theory is seemingly correct yet wrong. Its being so-called “correct' lies in its presupposition that two wings are better than one, but its essence is to degrade and deny the New May 4 Literature, and to reverse the verdict of the school of “Yuanhu', thus turning Chinese literature away from the right path. Secondly, the theory of “Two Wings' creates disorder on purpose among serious literature, popular literature and vulgar literature. It intentionally distorts the history of the New May 4 literature in terms of the gradual development in its nationalization, popularization and suiting both the refined and popular tastes, thus paving the way for vulgar literature.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28