略论无权处分合同的价值判断——从《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国合同法〉若干问题的解释(一)》看无权处分的效力  

On the Value Judgment of the Contract of No Right to Deal

作　　者：白玉廷[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东理工大学法学院法学研究所,山东淄博255000

出　　处：《法学论坛》2005年第4期131-135,共5页Legal Forum

摘　　要：在不采德国和我国台湾地区的负担行为和处分行为理论的前提下,解释我国合同法上的无权处分合同,必须注意合同的债权效力与处分效力之区分。合同因行为人无处分权而无效时,仅指不能产生处分效力,合同的债权效力不受影响。合同的债权权力采无果原则。Under the precondition of not using the theory of burden action and dealing action in Germany and chinese taiwan,need pay attention to the difference between creditors rights effectiveness and dealing effectiveness of contract in order to interpret the contract of having no right to deal in contract law.If contract is of no effect for party having no right to deal, only indicate that cannot produce dealing effectiveness,the creditors rights effectiveness will not be effected. The creditors rights of contract use the principle of no results.

关 键 词：无权处分合同 合同的债权效力 合同的处分效力 债权效力无果原则 

分 类 号：D923.1[政治法律—民商法学]