检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张声[1] 刘洋[1] 王丽花 陈超[1] 鲁巍[1] 张晓健[1]
机构地区:[1]清华大学环境科学与工程系,北京100084 [2]上海水环境建设有限公司,上海201203
出 处:《水处理技术》2005年第7期54-57,共4页Technology of Water Treatment
摘 要:试验以高藻水源水为处理对象,就两工艺流程(溶气气浮+活性炭过滤,溶气气浮+砂滤+活性炭过滤)对高藻原水中微量有机物的去除特性进行了考察。试验采用了强化混凝,气浮单元对有机物有一定去除效果,对DOC的去除率高于其它处理单元,而对于BDOC、AOC、HAAsFP,气浮单元的去除效果均弱于两流程的炭滤柱。流程2砂滤柱对有机物去除效果较差。对于试验考察的微量有机物,流程1的去除效果优于流程2,并且起主导作用的处理单元均为炭滤柱,而流程1炭滤柱的去除效果优于流程2炭滤柱。Characteristics of trace organics removal was studied during the treatment of algae-laden raw water with two process trains (dissolved air flotation GAC filtration, dissolved air flotation sand filtration +GAC filtration). Because of the application of enhanced coagulation, organics were removed by flotation, DOC removal by flotation was higher than that by any other treating unit; for BDOC, AOC, HAAsFP, removal by flotation was worse than that by any of the GAC filters in the two process trains. Poor organics removal was caused by sand filter in process train 2. Trace organics removal by process train 1 was better than that of process train 2, and most removal happened in GAC filters for both of the process trains, and removal by GAC filter in process train 1 was better than that by GAC filter in process train 2.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.185.110