检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨锅炉厂有限责任公司,黑龙江哈尔滨150046
出 处:《锅炉技术》2005年第4期26-30,共5页Boiler Technology
摘 要:在对ASME法规开孔筒体强度计算中的减弱系数法和开孔补强法进行对比分析的基础上,得出了当筒体开孔节距小于或等于补强有效范围时,采用开孔补强法求得了筒体壁厚较小;当前者大于后者时,采用减弱系数法求得了筒体壁厚较小的结论。指出根据筒体结构的不同特点,合理选用法规中的相应计算方法,可以使设计的产品既保证安全又节省材料。还给出了作为上述结论论据的例题。Based on the comparison between the ligament efficiency method and the hole reinforcement method specified by ASME code for strength calculation of the cylindrical shell with holes, following conclusion can be obtained: the shell thickness calculated by using hole reinforcement method will be smaller in case of hole spacing on shell is equal or smaller than the effective reinforcement scope; when the hole spacing is greater than the effective reinforcement scope, the shell thickness calculated by ligament efficiency method will be smaller. It should be indicated that according to the different features of shell construction, both safty and economy desige can be assured by reasonable selection of relevant calculation method. This paper also give the examples to illustrate above conclusion.
关 键 词:ASME法规 受压元件 强度计算 减弱系数 开孔补强 优化设计
分 类 号:TK225[动力工程及工程热物理—动力机械及工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3