层次分析法在草坪耐践踏性研究中的应用  

Application of analysis hierarchy process in assessment of traffic tolerance

作　　者：宋桂龙[1] 韩烈保[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京林业大学草坪研究所,北京100083

出　　处：《福建林学院学报》2005年第3期274-278,共5页Journal of Fujian College of Forestry

基　　金：国家高技术研究发展计划("八六三"计划)"北方半干旱都市绿地灌溉区节水综合技术体系集成与示范"项目(2002AA2Z428111);美国高尔夫球协会(USGA)的资助.

摘　　要：采用层次分析法对3种草坪草耐践踏性进行了综合评价.结果表明:综合评分在4.0以上的有轻、中度践踏下的结缕草和轻度践踏下的草地早熟禾;综合评分在3.0～4.0之间的有轻度践踏下的高羊茅、中度践踏下的草地早熟禾和重度践踏下的结缕草;评分在3.0以下的有重度践踏下的草地早熟禾和中重度践踏下的高羊茅.3种草坪草综合耐践踏能力:结缕草>草地早熟禾>高羊茅.Traffic tolerance of three kinds of turfgrasses(Poa pratensis L.,Fetuca arundinacea Schreb.,Zoysia japonica Steud.)were analyzed under different traffic stress through analysis hierarchy process(AHP). Results of the research indicated that Japanese Lawngrass under light and moderate traffic stress and Kentucky Bluegrass under light traffic stress scored more 4.0 , belong to the best group;Japanese Lawngrass under heavy traffic stress, Kentucky Bluegrass under moderate traffic stress and Tall Fescue under light traffic stress scored between 3.0~4.0; Kentucky Bluegrass under heavy traffic and Tall Fescue under moderate and heavy traffic stress scored below 3.0, belong to the worst group. Traffic tolerance of three kinds of turfgrasses was ranked as follows:Japanese Lawngrass>Kentucky Bluegrass>Tall Fescue.

关 键 词：层次分析法 草坪草 耐践踏性 综合评价 

分 类 号：S718.556[农业科学—林学]