检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国矿业大学文学与法政学院,江苏徐州221008
出 处:《阜阳师范学院学报(社会科学版)》2005年第4期89-92,共4页Journal of Fuyang Normal University:Social Science Edition
摘 要:本文从现行法律规定入手,认为我国农村集体土地的所有权主体为一定范围内的“农民集体”,但国家通过对农村集体土地的超法律限制,在现实层面已成为了真正意义上的所有权主体。对此,笔者从法理的角度进行了剖析,进而指出只有合理的并且得到了实施的制度安排才能真正解决我国农村集体土地所有权主体问题。最后,笔者对这种制度进行了初步的建构,即按照法人治理模式对农村集体土地所有权主体予以重塑,以法律的形式赋予“农民集体”法人资格,使之成为法人,还农村集体土地所有权主体以本来面目。This paper,based on the analysis of the current laws,holds that the subject of rural collective land ownership in china is'hrmer collective 'in acertain region. Nevertheless, in practice,the state becomes the real subject of land ownership,due to its over -law restriction to rural collective land. An analysis on this point is made in this article from the legal principle angle,holding that the problem of the subject of Chinese rural collective land ownership can be solved only by the implication of a reasonable instituion in this field. The preliminary construction of such an institution is made.i. e. ,reorganizing the subject of the rural collective land ownership in a legal person's contrOl model. In such a model, the 'farmer collective 'is entitled with legal personality,and then the subject of rural collective land ownership is restored.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3