第三人侵害债权理论:理论创新还是法学歧途?  

The Theory of the Third Party's Infringement of Editor's Right:Theoretical Creative of Law Science or Stray Road?

作　　者：魏盛礼[1] 

机构地区：[1]南昌大学法学院,江西南昌330047

出　　处：《河北法学》2005年第9期46-49,共4页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：被很多人视为民法理论的发展和创新的第三人侵害债权理论,泯灭了物权与债权之分,赋予债权普遍的对世效力,破坏了大陆法系概念法学的传统,导致逻辑体系的混乱。该理论混淆了权利与利益的差别,借用大陆法概念机械地解释英美法的财产法理论,在逻辑概念上陷入自相矛盾之中。债权人代位权制度和反不正当竞争法的理论,足以为债权人因第三人的行为遭受的损失提供充分救济。第三人侵害债权理论非但不是理论创新,反而陷入了理论歧途。The theory of the third party's infringement of editor's right which was seen as the development and creative of civil law by many people,confuses the difference between real right and editor's right,gives editor's right the effect to everyone,breaks the tradition of the concept method learns in civil law system,causes logical confusion.The theory confuses the difference between the right and benefits,uses the property legal theory in common law system,but uses concept in civil law system,sinks into logic antinomy.The constitution of the right of subrogation of the editor and the theory of fair competition law gives editor enough protection.The constitution of the third party's infringement of editor's rights is not only development but also lost in stray road.

关 键 词：第三人侵害债权 理论创新 债权人代位权制度 反不正当竞争法 民法理论 概念法学 大陆法系 逻辑体系 自相矛盾 逻辑概念 人的行为 英美法 法概念 物权 效力 权利 财产 救济 

分 类 号：D923.3[政治法律—民商法学] D261[政治法律—法学]