检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周芳坚[1] 余大敏[1] 谢晋良[1] 张向阳[1] 谢志光[1] 齐范[1] 黄福溥[1] 申鹏飞[1] 张时纯[1]
机构地区:[1]湖南医科大学附属湘雅医院泌尿科
出 处:《中华泌尿外科杂志》1995年第7期403-404,共2页Chinese Journal of Urology
摘 要:用恒压肾盂灌注(CPP)试验检测了10例解除上尿路梗阻术后病人上尿路功能,并将其结果与夹管试验和造影检查比较,以评价手术疗效。CPP试验结果通畅者术后随访肾功能均改善,不通畅者则肾功能恶化。夹管试验阴性者大部分肾功能改善,小部分肾功能恶化。造影检查通畅者肾功能均改善,但有部分梗阻者,其预后难以估计。我们认为CPP试验判断上尿路梗阻解除手术疗效准确可靠。To assess the efficacy of surgical management for upper urinary tract obstruction,constant pressure perfusion(CPP)test was carried out postoperatively in 10patients.The results were compared with urographic findings and clinical tube-clamp testing.The functional status of the kidney detected on follow up study corresponded well with the results observed on CPP test.When the reconstructed site was considered patent on tube-clamp testing.the kidney function improved in most cases but being progressively deteriorated in a few.When the reconstructed site was patent on urographic studies,the kidney function always improved but when partial obstruction was observed,the prognosis would be uncertain.CPP test was considered accurate and reliable in the assessment of the outcome of surgical reconstruction for upper urinary tract obstruction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.227